Capability comparison
| Capability | GetCited.me | Otterly |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | 5 live: Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overview | 4 on the base plan: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot. Gemini, Claude and Google AI Mode are paid add-ons — check their current add-on pricing |
| Technical GEO artifacts | File drafts (llms.txt, ai.txt, robots, JSON-LD, FAQ) + checklist | Visibility-first product — verify audit/file exports separately |
| Community engine | Reddit, Stack Overflow and Hacker News — threads discovered for you, then drafted with a critic loop | Not the core pitch — confirm if offered |
| Content + optimization | In-product briefs, editor, optimization score, schema | Reporting-led — content depth varies; verify current features |
| Closed loop | Scan → track → audit → draft → publish handoff → re-measure | Strong on monitoring; full loop depends on your stack around it |
| Pricing posture | USD, per-website seats, free tier included | Check Otterly plans for seat/engine limits |
Which one fits you?
Choose Otterly if…
You primarily need AI visibility monitoring, and their engine set and reporting fit your team today.
Choose GetCited.me if…
You also need a file-producing GEO audit, in-product content actions, a community reply workflow, and re-measurement after publish.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are you claiming Otterly lacks features?
No invented gaps. Where we are unsure, we say “verify on their site”. Products change — double-check both.
Do you track the same engines?
We track five live engines listed above. Compare against Otterly’s current public list before deciding.
Is GetCited.me only monitoring?
No — monitoring plus GEO artifacts, content briefs/editor, publishing handoff, and re-tracking.
Where do I start?
Scan a URL on the homepage, or open the pricing page for seats and limits.