- community platforms — Reddit, Stack Overflow, Hacker News
- 3
- post after human review — never auto-post
- you
- quality gates + critic loop before the draft ships to you
- gates
How it works
Surface AI-cited and opportunity threads
Threads are either already cited by your monitored answers or found by a scan. Each shows citations, angle, which engines cited it, and snippets that explain why it matters.
Draft with quality gates and a critic
A multi-step pipeline analyzes the thread, plans the reply, drafts in brand voice, runs deterministic quality gates (consultant voice; blocks title-mirror pitches), then a critic pass with up to two revision loops.
You review, copy, open, and post
Publishing stays with you. Track each thread as Suggested → Planned → Submitted (or Dismissed). This is not automated forum posting.
Plan limits that stay intentional
Drafts and regenerations per website and period: Launch 1 + 1, Growth 15 + 2, Scale 40 + 3. Reddit is always available; Stack Overflow and Hacker News suit for dev/SaaS-type sites.
What this is not
Trust first — then the draft
Every reply is a draft a human reviews and posts. Quality gates enforce a real consultant voice and block salesy title-mirroring. Durable community presence comes from genuine helpfulness — not volume bots.
- Not automated posting, mass-posting, or undisclosed promotion — you post yourself after review.
- Platforms: Reddit, Stack Overflow, and Hacker News — with honest plan and site-type availability.
- For recommendation-type questions, assistants often lean on third-party and community sources; helpful presence is how you enter answers you cannot write only on your own site.