Surfer SEO pricing, read from their own page
We do not retype these plans. On a schedule we read Surfer SEO's public pricing page and publish exactly what it showed, together with the date it showed it.
AI Search Analytics
€82/mo
Discovery
€49/mo
Standard
€99/mo
Pro
€182/mo
Peace of Mind
€299/mo
surferseo.com/pricing read on 19 October 2026
GetCited.me pricing, from our own catalogue
Our side is not a reading of somebody else's page: these are the live plan prices this site runs on, served by the same catalogue as our pricing page.
Launch
Freeforever
Testing the waters
Usable todayGrowth
$89/ mo per website
B2B SaaS teams scaling AI visibility
Scale
$249/ mo per website
Multi-site portfolios & power users
Capability comparison
| Capability | GetCited.me | Surfer SEO (AI Tracker) |
|---|---|---|
| AI surfaces tracked | 5 on paid plans | 5 in the per-plan feature list: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overview, Gemini |
| Publish to CMS | Drafts only — into WordPress (through our plugin) or Prismic; you press publish | Stronger here: a real WordPress plugin publishes in one or two clicks, plus Google Docs, Contentful and Zapier |
| Deployable GEO artifacts | llms.txt, ai.txt, robots rules, JSON-LD, checklist | Not found |
| Brand-confusion detection | Entity Clarify | Not a stated feature |
| Community reply drafting | Reddit, Stack Overflow and Hacker News — threads discovered for you, then drafted with a critic loop | Not a stated feature |
| Entry price | Free tier; paid up to $249/mo per website (see note below) | AI tracking is not included on the cheapest $49/mo tier. Bundled from $99/mo billed yearly (25 prompts, weekly); standalone AI Search Analytics from roughly $82–95/mo |
Which one fits you?
Choose Surfer SEO if…
Publishing throughput is your constraint and you want one tool to flag a gap, rewrite the exact page, and push it live to WordPress. Their content loop is more mature than ours, and their WordPress publishing is a genuine advantage today.
Choose GetCited.me if…
You care about where the citation actually points, not only about producing more pages — plus deployable technical artifacts and detection of brand confusion, which content tooling does not address.