Capability comparison
| Capability | GetCited.me | Rankscale |
|---|---|---|
| AI surfaces tracked | 5 on paid plans | 8 named engines on every tier, with no gating — broader baseline than ours |
| Multi-region coverage | Market-scoped tracking | All regions on every tier |
| Deployable GEO artifacts | llms.txt, ai.txt, robots rules, JSON-LD, checklist | Not found — their FAQ states the product suggests content rather than creating it |
| Brand-confusion detection | Entity Clarify | Not a stated feature |
| Community reply drafting | Reddit, Stack Overflow and Hacker News — threads discovered for you, then drafted with a critic loop | Not a stated feature |
| Content generation | Briefs and full articles | No — explicitly stated in their own FAQ |
| Entry price | Free tier; paid up to $249/mo per website (see note below) | Pro $99/mo (credit-metered), Growth $385/mo, Enterprise $780/mo; 7-day trial plus a free no-signup one-off analysis |
Which one fits you?
Choose Rankscale if…
You want the widest engine and region coverage bundled at one price with no per-engine upsell, and you are happy to handle the fixing yourself. Their no-gating model is cleaner than most of this category, and they are one of the few vendors here who publish their own llms.txt.
Choose GetCited.me if…
You want the work that follows the report — deployable artifacts, brand-confusion fixes, content and community drafts — rather than a broader read-only dashboard.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I get all the engines on the cheapest paid plan?
On Rankscale, yes: their pricing table lists the same eight named engines on every tier with no per-engine upsell, which is cleaner than most of this category. All five of our surfaces are on every paid plan too — the difference here is their breadth, not the gating. Checked 2026-08-09.
Does Rankscale write content for me?
No, and they say so themselves. Their FAQ states the product offers content improvement suggestions and side-by-side comparisons of current versus optimised content, but does not create content from scratch. We generate briefs and full articles with a publish-ready handoff.
How does their credit metering work?
Their paid tiers are metered in credits rather than a fixed prompt cap: Pro includes 1,200 credits a month, Growth 5,500 and Enterprise 12,000. Creating search terms is unlimited; running them consumes credits, and unused credits roll over up to a multiple of the monthly allocation. Confirm the current rates with Rankscale — we read these on 2026-08-09.
They publish their own llms.txt. Does that mean anything?
It means they practise the hygiene they sell, and in this category that is rare — Ahrefs, Surfer SEO, Profound and Peec AI all returned no llms.txt on the same check. Treat it as a credibility signal rather than a feature you buy: generating the files for your own site is still work you would be doing yourself.